Marina CCO proposal Debate

Environmental Benefits - Sustainability

Option 1

The argument supporting Option 1 emphasizes concerns about the sustainability of expanding the Marina, given the potential risks associated with sea level change and inundation. The commenter argues that transferring assets to an Asset-Owning Council Controlled Organisation (AOCC) is counterintuitive when considering the environmental implications of such expansions. They express apprehension that the proposed extension goes beyond practical needs and could be environmentally irresponsible, especially if managed by those who might disregard scientific evidence on climate impacts.

Table of comments:

Point No	Comment
1040.4	Significant money has already been gained by Council through Marina fees, to transfer assets to an AOCC seems counter intuitive - the proposed extension is already beyond what is necessary or seems practical in the face of sea level change and inundation  (this asset should not pass into the hands of those who are willing to ignore the science